On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:15:41PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > I've stated several times that calling conventions need changes to > > properly support HLLs with minor success at these times. > > With the diversity of HLLs out there, I'm not certain that it is wise to > declare one set of semantics "proper", thereby implicitly declaring all > others "improper".
Well, let's try "more coherent and less confusing", then, or maybe just "better". HLLs don't have to expose the 'self' parameter if they don't want to. Just extract it into a PMC register that's never used. -- Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
