On 2005-08-16 16:45, "Nicholas Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me, 1.e5 is not ambiguous. But maybe I've had too much dealing with
> floating point in a previous life.

1e5 is not ambiguous.  1.0e5 is not ambiguous, just overprecise.  1.e5 is
ambiguous.
 
> I'd find it hard defending a language that treated 1.e5 as a method call.

Guess we shouldn't sign you up for the Ruby Defense League, then?

irb(main):001:0> 1.e5
NoMethodError: undefined method `e5' for 1:Fixnum
        from (irb):1
irb(main):002:0> 



Reply via email to