On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 09:36:13AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > I don't see any reason to return the string at all. It's almost never > wanted, and you can always use .= or monkey but.
So: fail on failure bool::true on success? Pugs currently returns bool::true. Is there a way to tag a sub as failable? Should there be one? -- Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gaal.livejournal.com/
