On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:35 +0200, "TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)" wrote:
> Ups, I hoped that the type system would find out mismatches of the > objects actual structure and the methods expectations of it. Essentially > rendering the method in question not applicable to the object anymore. I'm not sure that scanning every active object at every sequence point is feasable in the face of rand() and AUTOMETH(). At some point I'm willing to say that if you lie about what your classes can do and someone catches you, you'll suffer the consequences. -- c
