* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-11T10:10:31] > >Note: The last kwalitee test, the one related to Devel::Cover, is > >considered dangerous by a non-trivial percentage of the community, > >and there's been a lot of debate on whether it should be removed. > > Sorry, I should have said Pod::Test::Coverage. > > Regardless, it executes code. I wonder how it deals with testing > Acme::BadExample. Remind me to put in a hard infinite loop.
I don't think you understand the test. CPANTS did not check for POD coverage, it checked that you seemed to have a pod coverage test. You could create one that did nothing, and that caused the test to pass. CPANTS does not evaluate your code, it just looks at it. The objection was that some people don't want to distribute that kind of test, because its results are for the developer's benefit, not the user's. -- rjbs
pgp76Z9L9ZWcd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
