On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:57:40AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote: > > > To manage varargs-style subroutines? > > > > But that's what :slurpy is for. > > But :slurpy always pulls things into a PMC (and creates PMCs > along the way). > > We need get_argc in order to know how many things were passed > into params marked :optional .
Hm. Well, as long as everybody knows it defeats lazy evaluation, I guess that works. -- Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
