On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > I've just misinterpreted this para and thought that we convert only > to/from PMCs but not between native types. I'll fix that.
That will be *very* nice. > >Lastly, while on the topic of calling conventions, has there been > >any thought given as to a standard convention for named argument passing > >in Parrot subroutines? There are a number of places in PGE where > >that would be really useful (and necessary...). > > The plan is to support named arguments. There is already a Pair PMC in > the tree for that. I definitely need to look into that. Thanks for the clarifications. Pm
