On 7/3/05, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 09:10 +0200, demerphq wrote: > > > Anyway, maybe ive gotten this all muddled and these arent issues > > people should worry about for some good reason or another. > > I certainly have a fuzzy idea of what you've done to run into these > problems. Can you post your code somewhere for review?
Well, its more what i was trying to do. Just ask yourself "how do a i write module that is exactly like Test::More except one of the tests has overloaded behaviour? The options to a certain extent seem to be whether you are writing a module that is intended to be used alongside Test::More or one that is intended to replace it. Anyway, ive put a copy of what i have so far temporarily up on my PM scratchpad: http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=361850 Im so far going with the strategy that my module replaces Test::More with itself. I decided not to overload any of its behaviour either and just add an extra method. yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
