On 6/30/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yves has some controversial ideas about what is and is not data structure > equivalence. I'd like comments on it.
Well while im disappointed that its considered to be a controversial position (why is accuracy and correctness controversial?) i do beleive it is important that this is debated outside of just the perl-qa list (its not that high traffic or visibility IMO) so I have taken the liberty of starting a thread on Perlmonks about this. It is at http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=471639. I also beleive that as Test::More is core it has certain obligations that mean that this issue should probably also be discussed on p5p. But for now lets see what happens. The motivation of all of us Im sure is the best interests fo the Perl community who consider Test::More to be a critical module whose quality and standards are vital to the ongoing success of the Perl world. After all this is the perl quality assuarace list right? cheers, Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
