On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:09:39PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > So, I conclude that is_deeply()'s behavior is ok and something like > Test::Deep should be enhanced with an option to deal with this > problem.
So, am I correct in understanding that is_deeply will only notice value differences, if all the reference types are the same? And Yves's proposal is that patterns of which references are dups must also match? And that you feel an option to do it the latter way would belong in Test::Deep?
