I just went to go patch in the code ref stuff to is_deeply() and found that I had unfinished changes to the diagnostic output. Remember, it was about including the description in the failure diagnostics. So instead of this:
/Users/schwern/tmp/test...NOK 1 # Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/test at line 5) # got: '42' # expected: '23' You get this: /Users/schwern/tmp/test...NOK 1 # Failed test "this is the test description" # in /Users/schwern/tmp/test at line 5 # got: '42' # expected: '23' There was some debate about the details, I don't remember how it all turned out but I like this new format. Any objections before I chuck it in? -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -- Phillip K. Dick