On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:37:52AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:21:00AM -0700, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote: > > On 6/13/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh no ... it's even worse than you think. Almost *any* opcode that > > > operates on a PMC can trigger a continuation. And I only need two > > > words to prove it: > > > > > > "Tied variables." > > > > Isn't this *exactly* why Perl 6 is requiring you to mark tied > > variables when they're declared? > > Yes.
Um: my $x is tied; tied $x, SomePackage; unsuspecting_victim(\$x); # ??? -- Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
