On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:20:57PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:19:42AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > : Do we still have the <<rule>> syntax, or was that abandoned in > : favor of <?rule> ? (I know there are still some remnants of <<...>> > : in S05 and A05, but I'm not sure they're intentional.) > > It's gone, though we're reserving it for something else we haven't > thought of yet. :-)
Excellent. I'll start updating S05 and A05 to match. While we're on the topic, can we also bless <+alnum-digit> as the official syntax instead of <+<alnum>-<digit>> ? I can make that change as well. And I think I have another post brewing regarding the relationship between character classes and subrules, but will save that for a bit later. Pm
