Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:10:08AM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
Anything other than 'got' would go some of the way in disambiguating things.
I forget now what the proposed alternatives were.
If I were starting from scratch, I probably would use 'returned' since
it's a C<return> value.
BUT, 'got' actually works better because it's a much shorter word and
thus makes a good visual cue next to a longer word like 'expected'.
Which is easier to parse visually
/Users/schwern/tmp/during....NOK 1
# Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/during.t at line 5)
# got: '23'
# expected: '42'
---
/Users/schwern/tmp/during....NOK 1
# Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/during.t at line 5)
# returned: '23'
# expected: '42'
---
/Users/schwern/tmp/during....NOK 1
# Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/during.t at line 5)
# actual: '23'
# expected: '42'
---
/Users/schwern/tmp/during....NOK 1
# Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/during.t at line 5)
# received: '23'
# expected: '42'
