Dino Morelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2005, Dino Morelli wrote:
>>On Sat, 7 May 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>>>>$ ./parrot -o foo.pbc foo.imc >>>>>$ ./parrot foo.pbc >>The part I'm unsure of is the exit codes. >>I could change it to watch for a bad code during the for loop with the >>system(), bail out right there and send that code back. > I thought about it and realized that this is wrong. All of the commands > that used to be one line need to be run or the test case won't see the > output it's looking for. Which in some cases is an intentional failure > with nonzero return value. Yep. > So, forget I said anything about the exit codes. The real patch: Thanks, applied. leo
