On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:14 -0700, Nick Glencross wrote: > These typos were part of a patch in #34989, but I confused everyone with > patch #34988 which got created through an accident. > > This patch supersedes typos3.patch in #34989. I also made reference to > 'rellocation' perhaps being 'relocation', but not feeling brave enough > to fix it as it is used in 'real code'.
Thanks, applied. -- c
