On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 11:21 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> > Maybe we could define an "ok" operator that suppresses only the > > *first* warning produced by its argument(s). Then if you get multiple > > warnings, you at least get some indication that you've overgeneralized, > > even if the "wrong" warning comes out. Or maybe it only suppresses > > the first warning till you get a second warning, and then it prints both. > And after the third warning, it sends you to your room with no supper. Talk about a strict permission system. If that's the case, I want a "I'm the human here, darnit!" option to bypass it. -- c
