On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:27AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:58:47AM -0600, Paul Seamons wrote: > : I would think that :p5 should behave as perl5 does by default. That would > : mean that /x and /s aren't on by default (for p5). > > I'm inclined to agree.
Okay. In that case, how about making Perl5ish adverbs work when :P5 is
specified? I have just checked in some code to make this work:
rx:P5:i:m:s:x:g/.../
Does it make sense to you?
> Just as a heads up, I'm thinking of changing :perl5/:p5 to :Perl5/:P5
> just to differentiate it from :parse/:p a little better..
Okay, currently I'm allowing all four forms then.
> : As this is my first post about pugs - all I can say is "wow." It is
> : great to already be coding perl6.
>
> I'm inclined to agree with that too. :-)
Thanks. :-)
/Autrijus/
pgpM9aBkBJmnw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
