On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:56:26AM -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I would go as for to say that checking the authors development intentions via checks like Test::Pod::Coverage, Test::Strict, Test::Distribution, etc is just as important, if not more, than just checkong syntax and that all tests pass.
CPANTS can't check that for me, as I don't ship those tests.
They're part of my development environment, not part of my release tree.
Tony
That is true. But if you don't ship them, how do I know you bothered to check those things in the first place?
[I don't think there is a right answer to that question by the way.]
I'm just saying that the presence of those types of tests bumps up some level of kwalittee, and they should be left alone within CPANTS.
-=Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
