On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

We gonna switch to SVN soon.

3) If no one utters a killer argument against, we'll switch to SVN

I tried svn again. I'm happy to report it worked much better than it did the last time I tried it. For one thing, it actually compiled for me.


It's still slower than cvs, but not as bad as it was before. An initial checkout took 56 minutes; subsequent updates took about 2 to 3 times as long as CVS. I'd judge that as still quite useable. So, no killer arguments here.

--
    Andy Dougherty              [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to