Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leopold Toetsch writes: >> But with one more indirection a PIC-like scheme can work with >> read-only bytecode too (probably). E.g. the assembler emits instead >> of the proposed: >> >> infix "__add", Pd, Pl, Pr >> >> this opcode: >> >> infix (.MMD_ADD << 24) | n, Pd, Pl, Pr
> Just 256? Why don't you add another argument to the infix opcode? 256 diffent infix operations with the signature _p_p_p should doit it for a while. If not the assembler can emit C<infix2> for the next bunch of 256 :) > Luke leo
