On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:02 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Syntax proposal: > > > .sub foo @MULTI > > .invocant Integer a > > .invocant Float b > > .param pmc c > > ... > > Alternate syntax: > > .sub foo multi(Integer, Float) > .param pmc a > .param pmc b > .param pmc c > > I'm now more inclined towards the second one: @MULTI smells too much > like the pragmas @ANON or @LOAD and the second form is possibly simpler > to extend if needed. The syntax plays also more nicely with plain > methods: > > .sub bar method > > and eventually with > > .sub baz multi(String, int), method > > Comments?
I like the first one in that it has the names and the types of the parameters in one place. Does it need the @MULTI attribute if there are some parameters declared with .invocant? -- c
