On 12.Mar.2005 11:41PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > nevertheless, what you are replying to was just a discussion > about a feature that doesn't exist in the standard Test::More > toolkit but was brought up because Apache-Test's plan() works > a bit differently and there are enough people who like it that > I thought it warranted a discussion here to see if T::M was > interested.
Yeah, I know, I was curious how the reason could fit into the _proposed_ Test::More additions. I'll do a better job at phrasing next time. :-) -- Ian Langworth Project Guerrilla Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science
