On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:27:23PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
> Given:
>
> class Foo {
> method Bar () {...};
> }
>
> sub Bar (Any $x) {...};
> my Foo $f;
>
> Bar $f;
>
>
> Is that last line the same as:
> &Bar.($f);
> or
> $f.Bar;
I don't see how it can be anything but the former. As I understand
things, when searching for a matching sub/method, the subs are
given preference over indirect objects.
> Does it matter if we change C< sub Bar > to C< multi sub Bar >?
Nope.
> Is there some form of implicit multi sub that gets created to make C<
> Bar $f; > C< $f.Bar >?
I don't think so.
> Or does it only work if there is no C< multi? sub bar > in sight?
That's how I see (no sub or multi in sight)
You can always be explicit if you really want to use the IO notation:
Bar $f:;
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
