Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:54:46PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
Could we also consider moving away from singletons that are hard-wired to Test::Builder? By that I mean make Test::Builder a 'factory' that gives either a default, plain vanilla Test::Builder object or else a specific subclass? E.g.,
use Test::Builder 'Test::Builder::Subclass'; #sets up the singleton as a subclass
use Test::More 'no_plan'; # uses the subclass object
This is too simplistic for Various Reasons that chromatic and I are still
hashing out.
Care to hash in public?
David
