On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 08:29 +0100, Uwe Voelker wrote: > What is the difference of the .imc file? They both look _very_ similiar. > I could try to port the demo. Do you have a few hints, what needs to be > done.
PASM is the simplest, most tedious language that Parrot supports. PIR is nicer. Of course, both have evolved over time, so the example source files are historically interesting in the same way as low-level geologic strata. Editing the example to use the .imc file instead of the .pasm file should just fix it, but if it doesn't, my favorite way to figure out what's wrong is to run parrot -t example_file, look for the line of code where things go wrong, and figure out what the right syntax is. The most current NCI examples are the SDL bindings in examples/sdl/ and runtime/parrot/library/SDL/. -- c
