Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say: .tail_call always does a tail call. The check_tail_call() can > be dropped then.
> leo > That takes IMCC out of the loop when it comes to tail-call optimization. > But IMCC seems like the natural place for doing these low-level > optimizations . . . Ok, lets leave that as is. Anyway, if a C<.tail_call> is already there it should be one. > In any case, the patch in the first attachment below does three > things: Thanks, applied. leo
