On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 02:40:00PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote: > I addressed earlier concept of how does perl know when there are side > effects, particularly with the execution path can weave to parts written > in pure-parrot. Patrick responded by implying > that there was no such side effect protection.
I should've included this in my previous post...and write it now simply to promote clarity/completeness: My response in #19212 was intended to show that the side-effect problems being described don't exist, and therefore there isn't any need for "side-effect protections" such as the ones being proposed. I didn't mean to imply that they would be needed but not available. Pm
