On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:02:45PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:12:51PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > I briefly grepped through the apocalypses/synopses and couldn't > > find the answer -- how do I tell a scalar context to expect a > > junction of values? In particular, is there a way for me to pass > > a junction to a routine without it autothreading and without having > > to bury the junction in an array or some other structure? > > If you have control over that routine, argument prototypes is probably > the way to go.
I just hadn't seen a C<Junction> data type listed anywhere in the synopses/apocalypses. Damian has since given me the same answer you provided. Pm
