On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:07:10PM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Markus Laire wrote: > > > > I was wondering if it would make sense to add the original 're_tests' > > file to parrot distribution, with a script which autogenerates > > 're_tests.t' from it. This way it would be possible to update the script > > if testing-format is changed, or if some bigger mistakes are seen.
I forgot to mention in my previous mail -- if (when?) we change the testing format we're probably going to want a way to convert all of the other tests in p6rules (i.e., the ones that didn't come from 're_tests'). It will probably be just as easy, if not easier, to convert the manually edited re_tests.t file using whatever converter we come up with then. Just a thought. Pm
