On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:59:00PM -0000, Orton, Yves wrote: > Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter this file this > will affect all "make dist" commands?
Only if that module doesn't have its own MANIFEST.SKIP. > Is there any chance the default could have ".bak" added in future releases? I've considered that many times. I'll slap it in. > Also will the fact that some of the > patterns depend on *NIX style paths be an issue on Win32? Im guessing not, > but i think its worth asking. No, MANIFEST files are always Unixy. > And no the version on my machine doesnt look (exactly) like either one you > linked to: Ok, that's good enough. If you throw in pmfiles.dat$ that should solve your Module::Signature problems. The last few releases of Perl shipped with the wrong MANIFEST.SKIP file. That's what I was looking for. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Home of da bomb
