Michael G Schwern wrote on 16 December 2004 23:06 > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:59:00PM -0000, Orton, Yves wrote: > > Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter > this file this > > will affect all "make dist" commands? > > Only if that module doesn't have its own MANIFEST.SKIP.
Ok, that makes sense. > > > > Is there any chance the default could have ".bak" added in > future releases? > > I've considered that many times. I'll slap it in. Thank you. :-) > > > Also will the fact that some of the > > patterns depend on *NIX style paths be an issue on Win32? Im guessing not, > > but i think its worth asking. > > No, MANIFEST files are always Unixy. > Ok, good to know. > > And no the version on my machine doesnt look (exactly) like either one you > > linked to: > > Ok, that's good enough. If you throw in pmfiles.dat$ that > should solve your Module::Signature problems. Great. Thanks. Cheers, Yves
