On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:18:17PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Good idea Schwern.
> These test suites inevitably degenerate into macro crack-pipe
> smoking sessions. Lacking 'eval', it is always going to be very
> hard work to even get close to Perl's Test::More functionality
> and ease-of-use in C.
>
> I don't have a filthy enough mind to make your:
> cmp_ok(foo, 'int', '==', bar);
> macro work (mainly because '==' is not a valid C identifier).
> But I can make this one work:
> cmp_ok(foo, int, eq, bar);
> pretty easily:
Whoa.
> #include <stdio.h>
> void cmp_ok_inteq(int s, int t) {
> printf("in cmp_ok_inteq: %d %d\n", s, t);
> }
> void cmp_ok_streq(const char* s, const char* t) {
> printf("in cmp_ok_streq: '%s' '%s'\n", s, t);
> }
> #define cmp_ok(s, y, o, t) cmp_ok_##y##o(s, t)
> int main() {
> int ifoo = 42;
> int ibar = 43;
> static const char* sfoo = "foo";
> static const char* sbar = "bar";
> cmp_ok(ifoo, int, eq, ibar);
> cmp_ok(sfoo, str, eq, sbar);
> return 0;
> }
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Kids - don't try this at--oh, hell, go ahead, give it a whirl...
