Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:+I<Only> if there are overflow parameters. Otherwise garbage
+=item I0 + +=item I1-I4
I3 isn't always visible?
Effectively it is, yes.
> ... Fetching the return continuation+may be expensive, and should only be done if truly necessary.
Err, e.g. for returning from the sub?
This would imply a distinct return opcode instead of C<invoke P1>.
That went in, or was supposed to go in, as part of moving the return continuation into the interpreter struct. I presume this hasn't happened?
--
Dan
--------------------------------------it's like this-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
