Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:19:22PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Having a type enum for these abstract types would imply to install a >> vtable, filled with methods that catch errors. > I never proposed the installation of vtables for these types. Well, then a type enum for abstract types is probably not useful anyway. > there should be an integer range reserved for these abstract types. > Being outside the range for regular pmc type they would not > need any vtable. And then? leo
