Dan Sugalski writes: > Time to nail this. > > We need namespaces. Duh. We talked about this in the past. > > So, here's what I'm proposing. It'll be formalized into a PDD once we > hash things out. > > *) Namespaces are hierarchical > > So we can have ["foo"; "bar"; "baz"] for a namespace. Woo hoo and all > that. It'd map to the equivalent perl namespace of foo::bar::baz. > > *) Namespaces and sub-spaces can be overlaid or aliased
Can you say, in ["foo"; "bar"; "baz"], toss in a different namespace implementation for ["foo"; "bar"] and have that call some function with "baz"? Will this work if it's ["foo"; "bar"; "baz"; "quux"]? Luke
