On Sep-06, Jens Rieks wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > So first: > > - do we keep these opcodes? > > If yes some permutations are missing. > > - if no,? we should either not include experimental.ops in the default > > opcode set or move it to dynops. > I have not used them yet, but I think that they can be useful. > Has anyone else except Leo and Dan used them?
I use them for debugging printouts, when I want to print the status of something without defining a bunch of labels and contorting the control flow. I also use them for simple non-short-circuiting ors and ands. Nothing terribly important or irreplaceable.
