On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:46:53 -0400, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The big question is whether being clever and producing the tightest > type is worth the time to figure out what that type is, as well as > the potentially uncertain output type.
Tangentially related: will promotion be suitably delayed on systems with support for 64-bit ints? More generally, what is the state-of/plan-for "64-bit support" (whatever that may mean) in Parrot? -John