Stephane Peiry wrote:
g_return_val_if_fail (G_IS_OBJECT (gobject), 0); <<<< Fails here
anyway I just dont see what could be wrong with the way parrot could be passing the "user_data"?
gtk shouldn't make assumption on the user_data argument IMHO.
Whats the difference between the way parrot calls this, and the way the C example is doing it? As the parrot example follows exactly the same steps as the C one.
The C example had NULL as user_data.
Stephane
leo
