On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:57:21AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: You'll also want to make sure the zip operator (¥) gets in there,
: probably with the same precedence as ==> (unless we decide it's
: a scalar-only operator, in which case it can be tighter because it
: would only work on array refs).  It also has self-associativity issues
: much like ^ and ==> and, if you squint, semicolon inside subscripts.

It the moment the zipper has moved to be the same precedence as comma,
because it really wants to be looser than ranges but tighter than
listops.  Plus it's sort of like a »,« if you squint.  I'm eagerly
awaiting my first opportunity to use the »¥« operator in anger...

Larry

Reply via email to