On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:37:29PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > We allowed/required @foo to interpolate in Perl 5, and it catches a > certain number of people off guard regularly, including yours truly. > So I can argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] both ways.
Currently @foo[] is a syntax error. maybe "@foo[]" in Perl6 could be what "@foo" is in Perl5? And I mean a literal '[]', not "@foo[expression-that-returns-an-empty-list]" Dave -- You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive.
