[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Bowden) writes: [...] > > > lots of SQL to a common format. Both seem much too cumbersome, however. > > > Anyone have any brighter ideas? > > Don't use a temporary database, just a temporary table. > > Surely that's more work?
That depends on how you open your databases and how much trouble it is to use another database compared to munging the table name. :-) - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();
