On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:02:15AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:17 PM +0000 7/15/04, Steve Peters wrote: > >On Friday 16 July 2004 02:46 am, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> And language builtin namespaces in general. We need a standard, and > >> now's as good a time as any, so... > >> > >> All language-specific builtin functions go into the _core_Language > >> namespace. (So for Python it's _core_Python, Perl 5 is _core_Perl5, > >> and so on) > > > >Just as a side question, will these language specific namespaces be > >available > >to other languages? > > Yes. And, as my addled brain churns on this some more, we had a > standard we semi-hashed-out a while back for the proper way to do > this with hierarchical namespaces.
Yeap. This one http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=20040116110746.GA38383%40dansat.data-plan.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26safe%3Doff%26selm%3D20040116110746.GA38383%2540dansat.data-plan.com > We can re-hash that in August and > nail it down, at which time I'll redo the translator program for > python bytecode. (Because, bizarrely, I'd actually like this to morph > into something production-worthy. Go figure) :) Tim.
