On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote:
> Put more clearly, it is now common to see things like:
>
> for my $x (1..10) {
> for my $y (5..20) {
> for my $text (qw/foo bar baz/) {
> do_stgh_with $x, $y, $text;
> }
> }
> }
>
> and it would be very much in the phylosophy of Perl to allow for a very
> concise syntax to obtain the same effect. I am aware of the zip operator,
> but AFAICT it solves an equally common but completely different problem...
Are you sure?
for zip(1..10, 5..20, <<foo bar baz>>) -> $x, $y, $text {
do_something_with $x,$y,$text;
}
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
