Stéphane Payrard skribis 2004-06-25 16:15 (-0400): > It is unpossible to stack loop modifiers without adding > conventions denoting the iterators.
Is it really? I've always thought this would be useful enough:
say .{foo} for @$_ for @foo;
Although that can probably just be written as:
say .{foo} for @<<@foo; # Looks strange. Is this correct?
Juerd
