Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2:38 PM +0200 6/11/04, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
>>how about having complex numbers as another basic PMC? >>At least QCL, http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/qcl.html, C99 and PDL, >>http://pdl.perl.org/, have them as a basic type. As well as Python. > For right now I want to hold off--the basic PMC types all correspond > to a low-level type, and we don't have a complex low-level type. We > can think about complex numbers later on, probably as part of the > library. Think faster :) I think that a complex PMC type is in order. We can move it to a Python library later, when we do classes cleanup. > Dan leo
