Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Why don't we wait a bit? I should be done with the second draft of
> the events/IO spec today, and we can go from there.

That's alway an option ;) But, if you did read on, there was a bit more
to think about. Not directly event/IO related.

And: fixing the C<readline> opcode isn't related to these either, it's
just broken as hell and unusable.

I know that's all related, and with integrating events and async IO a
lot will change, but some restructuring can be done in parallel. Unicode
string handling and IO is a bit less broken now, but the input side is
still lacking any support.

leo

Reply via email to