On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 12:18, Butler, Gerald wrote: > Now, we > have people talking about doing "LSL/LSR" on "Strings". That is 100% > inconsistent with that definition of a "String".
Not at all, and keep in mind that I didn't propose this out of the blue. "bands", "bxors" and "bors" are existing string ops and have been for a long time. I was just proposing rounding out the bit operator set. Go check out the ops/bit.ops in CVS. It's even well documented. I don't think Dan was being at all contradictory or inconsistent in his string postings, given that those ops were already there. I may have problems with the extent to which Parrot embraces abstraction, but inconsistency is not one of them. -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith "It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!'" -Shriekback
