At 4:10 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to double-check--it's OK to register *any* sub as a compiler
module, though for right now it'll ultimately need to call compile
itself to either the pasm or pir compiler module and return the
result of that, yes?
That's more a matter of definition then anything else. As long as you
can invoke the returned thingy, and it does run the code, it doesn't
really matter. It just differs when it comes to writing the compiled
compiler code to disc as e.g. F<languages/parrot_compiler/parrot.pasm>
does.
Cool, that's what I wanted to know. Thanks.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
