Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Off the top of my head, I can think of three instances where building > without dynamic loading is relevant:
Ok. We need some more Configure support for this. First: if --disable-shared or such is set on Configure., we should disable dynamic targets in the Makefile, so that build doesn't fail. > ... The fall-back may be severly limited, but it > would be nice if it weren't a complete failure. Yep. leo